Is something wrong in asking and questioning? In “aude sapere”?
What is the real matter of homeopathy?
Should we stay as we were before the disease or transform through it?
Is there a place in Organon (in homeopathy) for inner transformation?
* Is a disease caused by unpleasant, outward “infection” (with miasm §72) and should it be just “removed and annihilated” (§2)?
* Is a disease not really a disturbance in adaptation, inappropriate reaction to outside factors, inner problem of selfregulation?
* What causes the derangement of the vital force (selfregulation)?
* What is this mysterious “morbific agent inimical to life”? (§11)?
* Is not the very first cause of the derangement of vital force the inner misinterpretation of the reality? The errors of judgment are the main problem of the derangement, aren’t they? Is this not an inner problem?
Where is there in Organon a place for “Errare humanum est”?
* Do you make recurrent errors or are you rather a Saint?
* Do not the errors of the judgment remain hidden all the time and only sometimes appear?(§6) Could we observe and heal the errors before morbid symptoms appear? Could we prevent diseases with homeopathy? How could homeopathy help to correct these errors?
Was not this an observation made by Hahnemann himself?
(§141, footnote)
Experience shows on the contrary, that the organism of the prover becomes, by these frequent attacks on his health, all the more expert in repelling all external influences inimical to his frame and all artificial and natural morbific noxious agents, and becomes more hardened to resist everything of an injurious character, by means of these moderate experiments on his own person with medicines. His health becomes more unalterable; he becomes more robust, as all experience shows.
Could the remedies be reflections of erroneous states?
Inner, spiritual pattern of them?
Should we not use them more intensely,
more fluently?
Not to waste patient’s time waiting after only one prescription?
* Is not intensifying of the current state – evoking aggravation – the proper way to help to overcome the error, the false judgment, misinterpretation, improper reaction by the Self (§63, §64)?
* Is health not self-reliance, the adequate reaction to outside world?
* Is not real development overcoming inner errors?
Is real healing not the way
to salutogenesis,
to developement?
* By ourselves alone do we have inner influence on our health?
* How should we use homeopathy properly as an aid in developement?
Is this possible
that wrong used homeopathy (isopathy?) only covers, sweeps aside errors without
resolving them?
Could we use homeopathy in the wrong way?
* Should we not continue and develop Hahnemann’s epochal work?
* Was he perfect? Has he made no errors? What are his errors then?
* How can we develop in homeopathy without realizing them?
Thinking the same way?
Eager to discuss this matter?
Send your considerations to .